Gmail Christopher Castellano <chris.castellano88@gmail.com>

Re: 1060hPa anticyclone and climate change

Kyle Griffin <kgriffin@atmos.albany.edu> Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:30 PM
To: Richard Grumm <richard.grumm@noaa.gov>
Cc: Map <map@atmos.albany.edu>
Hi Rich (and everyone),

I have a couple of real-time standardized anomaly loops that you might find interesting. From a complete northern polar projection, loops of PW and 500 heights show some very interesting pattern, suggestive of an atmospheric river extending from a storm associated with a cyclone off the eastern coast of the US this time last week (~0000 UTC 24 Jan), progressing east and perhaps merging with an additional moisture source in the subtropical eastern Atlantic (26-27 Jan, around 30-40W) before turning north across Iceland and Svalbard (29-30 Jan) and into central Siberia as of present. As Rich pointed out, these aren't particularly moist values of PW as most of us are used to them, but are rather anomalous as his images and these images show, and are likely aiding in the maintenance of the upper level ridge across central Russia (also anomalous, >3 sigma). GFS forecasts (in the loops below) also suggest the North Atlantic storm track is likely to continue feeding moisture into the eastern half of the Arctic and onward into central Siberia throughout the next week or so. Will be interesting to see how that changes with the pattern alterations coming just beyond that time frame.


Other maps in the Arctic projection, such as 500 height std. anomalies:

Complete real-time site, including std. anomalies for other regions:


Kyle
-----------------------------------------------------
Kyle S. Griffin
Dept. of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences
University at Albany, SUNY
1400 Washington Ave, Albany, NY 12222
Office: ES-218   Email: kgriffin@atmos.albany.edu
http://www.atmos.albany.edu/student/kgriffin/



On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Richard Grumm <richard.grumm@noaa.gov> wrote:
List

I made some better projections (http://eyewall.met.psu.edu/rich/cases/30Jan2012/) and sequenced images.

I believe the 850 hPa MFLUX was well over 6 sigma along with the PW anomalies at Spitsbergen. Thus, I sit corrected as the PW anomalies were really high there.

I also found the elusive 1060 hPa high in the NCEP GFS.

Nice 500 hPa ridge too. Impressive.

I suspect the rains were in the 28-30 Jan time frame.

Was it predictable?

Rich


On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Richard Grumm <richard.grumm@noaa.gov> wrote:
Mel,

So when did it rain? I will attach another image. Funny, I deleted the text about the anomalous (6s) PW anomalies over the ridge in my original email. Thought it was superfluous and wouldn't wash. May bad. The PW field and anomalies were sent with the pressure image. But this image (below) shows it too.

Hard to believe that 16mm of PW is +6sigma. No wonder they are all wet up there. Reindeer smell real bad when wet, trust me on this.

I had to find out where exactly Spitsbergen was (attached), then spell it. Probably in the 3sigma area not the 6sigma.

Good thing about being stupid in the digital age is one can look smart when the internet is working.


Rich


On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Mel Shapiro <mshapiro@ucar.edu> wrote:
[Quoted text hidden]



--
Life is a journey not a destination.



--
Life is a journey not a destination.