Abstract
Vegetated, or “green” roofs are used in urban architecture and
sustainable building to capture stormwater and enhance urban
wildlife. Most research to date has focused on their water
retention capabilities, but green roofs also have the potential to
treat anthropogenic acid precipitation in urban
environments. More specifically, green roofs could reduce
sulfate, nitrate and hydrogen ion concentrations in runoff.
One previous study has demonstrated that nitrate was reduced in
water draining from a green roof (Berndtsson, et al. 2006), but
this unpublished thesis appears to be the first comprehensive
study of the effects of vegetated roof materials on major ions and
acidity in runoff. The objective of this current research
was to test whether green roofs could significantly modify
acidified precipitation. Experiments were conducted using a
variety of materials commonly used in modern green roof design.
Twenty different experimental roof surfaces,
each with an area of 0.5 m2, were constructed and exposed to
ambient rainfall during the 2008 growing season. Twenty of
these plots simulated green roof constructions varying by
vegetation, drainage material and soil (substrate) depth and
composition. Substrate types included one commercially
available topsoil and three hydroponic soils; low density,
inorganic materials commonly used in green roofing. Runoff
samples were collected from the green roof plots and a control, a
traditional asphalt-shingled roof plot. Precipitation was
collected in a funnel-style bulk precipitation collector.
Collections followed ten precipitation events that occurred
between June and October, 2008. Water samples were measured
for pH and alkalinity and analyzed via ion chromatography for
concentrations of 10 major ions.
As a group, the experimental green roofs
effectively lowered nitrate ion concentrations in runoff and
raised pH to near-neutral values (from 6.8 to 7.8, varying with
roof construction), compared to a mean pH in precipitation of
5.3. The weighted average of nitrate concentrations in
precipitation was 0.03 meq/L while average concentrations in the
three types of hydroponic substrate plots were one-third lower, at
0.02 meq/L for each substrate type. In contrast, roofs with
topsoil substrates had the opposite effect; average nitrate
concentration was 0.40 meq/L. This increase could be due to
nutrients leaching from the topsoil.
Sulfate ion concentrations were increased in
water captured from all green roofs. The weighted average
sulfate concentration of precipitation was 0.03 meq/L.
Topsoil substrate plots had average concentrations between
0.46-0.86 meq/L, while hydroponic plots had lower increases in
sulfate concentration with values ranging between 0.04-0.19
meq/L. The effects of vegetation, substrate thickness, and
drainage material on ion concentrations in runoff were
insignificant.
In addition to these results, this study
indicates that the geographic origins and pathways of weather can
control sulfate and nitrate ion concentrations and pH of
precipitation falling in the northeastern United States. In
precipitation from two tropical systems (Tropical Storm Hanna and
Hurricane Kyle), sulfate and nitrate concentrations were at their
lowest values (≤0.01 meq/L) and pH reached the highest levels
measured throughout the experiment (6.9 for Hanna and 6.1 for
Kyle) as compared to all other precipitation events. These
results are likely due to the absence of sulfur and nitrogen
emitters in the path of these two weather systems.
Although sulfate wet deposition in the
northeastern United States has declined since the passage of the
Clean Air Act in 1970 and amendments in 1990, concentrations of
reactive forms of nitrogen remain high, and pH remains low.
This study is one of the first to demonstrate that, in addition to
intercepting stormwater, many green roof materials can improve
stormwater quality, enhancing their environmental value as
elements of sustainable urban building design.
Gillen, J., 2009. The effect of vegetated roofs on acid
precipitation runoff.
Unpublished MSc. thesis, State University of New York at
Albany. 82 pp., +xi
University at Albany Science Library call number: SCIENCE
Oversize (*) QC 869 Z899 2009 G55
MS thesis text pdf 1.3MB
Return to MS Theses completed in
the Geological Sciences Program, University at Albany